Trump’s Mortgage Move Sparks “QEx” Debate and Rate Skepticism

The post is a response to affirmation that housing finance agencies will implement the order of President Trump to buy mortgage-backed securities worth up to 200 billion dollars. This action was instantly compared to quantitative easing and Richard Mize called it QEx. The response is less enthusiastic and more surprised. To a large part of the observers, the policy is not new. It reverberates on interventions of the crisis times. But it is the timing that is questionable.

Questions Over Transmission of Rates

Mize openly wonders how this would in fact drive the mortgage rates down. The inflation has already been cooled. The Federal Reserve has turned to relaxing. It is on that background that the mechanism becomes vague. The question placed at the heart of skepticism is whether buying bonds would be viewed with the same degree of effectiveness in a market where markets already assumed a freer policy. Effectiveness may be flattened by expectations.

What History Suggests?

The long-term mortgage rates have been reduced by past QE-type mortgage bond purchases through increased demand and reduced yield. Similar actions have been found to have measurably decreasing effects. But these effects were greatest when the financial situation was a strain. In 2026, conditions are different. Markets are calmer. Liquidity is healthier. That could restrict the scale of any rate relief.

There is a wider uncertainty in the reaction. Previously dominant policy means to move markets to decisive locations are experiencing diminishing returns. Shareholders desire definite results, as opposed to size. The discussion of the QEx may not be a convincing one until the cost of the borrowed money actually reacts to it.