Major BTC Outflows: 1,000 BTC From Binance and 465 BTC

Lookonchain records tremendous withdrawals at leading exchanges. One thousand BTC was withdrawn by a new wallet that pulled out the funds at Binance. FalconX has been deprived of a second new wallet that took away 465 BTC. The moves took place in a span of five hours. The value of USD reported is approximately USD162 million.

A newly created wallet bc1q0q just withdrew 1,000 $BTC($110.65M) from #Binance.

Another newly created wallet bc1qxm withdrew 465 $BTC($51.47M) from #FalconX in the past 5 hours.https://t.co/QdCwqEvST1https://t.co/E5WOkEBU77 pic.twitter.com/8jXQgEtstz

— Lookonchain (@lookonchain) October 16, 2025

Transaction specifics

Binance transferred 1000 BTC to bc1q0q wallet. The screenshot reveals an interconnected Arkham traveler. The value of USD is approximately 110.65 million. FalconX transferred 465BTC to bc1qx wallet. Arkham depicts the FalconX outflow. FalconX moved about $51.47 million.

The links contain complete transaction identifiers. The screenshots have block timestamps. Addresses are in modern Bech32 format. The wallets do not have a previous history. The amount of transfer represents the institutional scale. The images have chain confirmations. Binance was the sender of the 1,000 BTC. Binance has several hot wallets. FalconX was the payer of the 465 BTC. FalconX deals with institutional OTC. The two exchanges cater to large volumes of custody. Both platforms usually transfer finances to settle clients.

Possible Motives

Custody moves may be a result of large withdrawals. Institutions can move assets to cold storage. The new position of the wallets implies new custody arrangements. The trend also applies to the accumulation by the privates. Analysts referred to it as quiet stacking in the thread. The exchange supply declined due to these transfers. Weak exchange supply may strain markets upwards. However, it takes one event to hardly move the market. Traders suggested following the trends of flows.

Buys are not equal to withdrawals. Organizations are able to retreat to sell BTC off-chain. The hack risk seems to be minimal in these screenshots. The transfers appear to be organized and routine. Viewers pressured checking through explorers. Lookonchain has a good on-chain reputation. Arkham offers wallet labelling and profiling. Screen shots are equivalent to Arkham records.

Market reaction

Mixed sentiment was displayed when community replied. Other users referred to the moves as being bullish. There were warnings of possible dumps. The thread stimulated the revival of whale-tracking. They can reduce on-the-job selling pressure. They would cause the short-term volatility.

Supply tightness can increase, in case institutions keep withdrawing. They can promote speculative purchasing. Long term holders minimize the floating exchange balances. The price support can be provided to become stronger with time. Custody addresses are something that market players should follow. The tweet is connected with Open Arkham. Check transaction numbers and dates. Confirmation of check blocks on explorers. Monitor wallets in future movements. Monitor exchange reserve tendencies.