John Deaton Reacts to Cardano Founder’s Ethereum Predictions: A Blockchain Battle Looms?

The founder of Cardano, Charles Hoskinson, predicted that Ethereum would disappear between 10 and 15 years ago. People in the cryptocurrency community discussed his predictions after John Deaton released his statements defending XRP. We must scrutinize the disputed forecast by evaluating upcoming changes that could affect Ethereum.

What’s Behind Hoskinson’s Prediction on Ethereum’s End?

The future demise of Ethereum became a subject of widespread interest after Charles Hoskinson predicted its disappearance by the end of the next decade. During a recent Ask Me Anything interview, the Cardano founder shared his opinion that Ethereum would perish by 2030. He based his views on critical defects that he observed in the Ethereum network.

The network seems deficient to Hoskinson as he believes Proof-of-Stake (PoS), an Ethereum consensus mechanism, lacks sufficient capability to fulfill its operational needs. The Ethereum PoS system undergoes criticism from his perspective as it demonstrates an inadequate framework for extended network expansion. In his assessment, Hoskinson identified layer 2 blockchain scaling solutions as “parasitic.” Hoskinson identified governance limitations within Ethereum through his off-chain governance evaluation, as it might interfere with the platform’s ability to evolve effectively in the future.

John Deaton Reacts to Hoskinson’s Statements

XRP network expert John Deaton delivered his opinion in response to Hoskinson’s statements, as he remains closely linked with the XRP system. John Deaton accepted Hoskinson’s statements because Hoskinson played a vital part in Ethereum’s initial development. The lifespan of Ethereum was a topic of general interest to Deaton. Yet, he did not agree or disagree with its longevity while seeking different perspectives from the crypto community.

Fascinating to listen to an Ethereum co-founder opine on whether Ether can even survive. I’m not smart enough to have an opinion one way or the other but would like to know what others think. https://t.co/CdpTQkq41X

— John E Deaton (@JohnEDeaton1) April 24, 2025

According to Deaton’s tweet, the Ethereum co-founder’s opinion about Ether’s survival ability is intriguing. ‘’My lack of intelligence makes me unable to form a clear opinion, but I seek insight from others,’’ he said. Deaton shows his attention to Hoskinson’s perspective through this brief remark, which enables him to deepen his understanding of Ethereum’s potential.

Why Does Charles Hoskinson Predict Ethereum’s Demise?

According to Hoskinson, Ethereum faces three fundamental issues, which he predicts will eventually bring about its demise. The consensus model represents the first major defect, in Hoskinson’s opinion. Hoskinson doubts Proof-of-Stake as a defensive measure since its implementation received widespread approval for Ethereum’s network security. In Hoskinson’s opinion, PoS fails to resolve fundamental problems that affect scalability and decentralization.

Hoskinson critiqued Ethereum’s use of layer 2 solutions in his analysis. Hoskinson says layer 2 solutions represent parasitic scaling mechanisms because they require the main Ethereum chain and do not fundamentally address blockchain scalability problems.

Hoskinson focused on Ethereum’s governance model as its most crucial issue. Ethereum’s governance exists off-chain, requiring decisions from outside entities instead of directly from its community members. Hoskinson views this open-source method as problematic because it makes it difficult for the platform to adapt to upcoming technical difficulties.

What’s Next: A New Era for Ethereum or Its End?

The opinions expressed by Hoskinson attract attention, yet they do not prove whether Ethereum’s current system will succeed in resolving those issues. According to Deaton, time will reveal which blockchain project will win the crypto market. Ethereum displays resilience against opposition, but the blockchain community should take seriously Hoskinson’s warnings about its potential end.