Dogecoin Team Slams Bitcoin’s Dominance, Calls Out Saylor’s “Maxi” Mindset

The Dogecoin development team has taken a public jab at Bitcoin’s dominance in the crypto market—this time, with a colorful metaphor. Comparing Bitcoin to the classic kids’ game “Hungry Hungry Hippos,” the Dogecoin Foundation has voiced concern over what they see as Bitcoin’s overly aggressive attempt to consume every corner of the digital asset landscape. Their remarks came in direct response to Bitcoin advocate Michael Saylor’s recent comments suggesting that “Bitcoin is the only game worth playing.”

Dogecoin Claps Back: “Not a Zero-Sum Game”

In a series of tweets and developer forum posts, the Dogecoin team pushed back against what they view as an increasingly narrow and monopolistic vision of the crypto future. “This isn’t Hungry Hungry Hippos,” the team wrote. “The goal shouldn’t be to gobble up everything in sight. That’s not decentralization—it’s domination.”

The message was clear: crypto isn’t meant to be a winner-takes-all race. Dogecoin developers emphasized the need for a multi-chain future where Bitcoin, Ethereum, Dogecoin, and countless other networks can coexist and thrive together—each bringing their own unique utility and value to users.

Their tone, while playful, underlined a growing tension in the crypto community around Bitcoin maximalism—the belief that Bitcoin is the only legitimate cryptocurrency and all others are inferior or doomed.

Michael Saylor and the Case for Bitcoin Maximalism

Michael Saylor, Executive Chairman of MicroStrategy and one of Bitcoin’s most vocal champions, recently stated that Bitcoin is “a game we can all win,” portraying it as the most secure and decentralized store of value the world has ever known. His comments were meant to inspire unity around a single global currency, but critics argue they stifle the spirit of innovation that brought blockchain technology into the mainstream in the first place.

Saylor’s firm has accumulated more than 200,000 BTC over the past few years, reinforcing his commitment to Bitcoin’s future as digital gold. He often dismisses altcoins—including Ethereum—as “untested experiments,” doubling down on his view that Bitcoin alone can carry the torch of decentralization forward.

Diversity as Crypto’s Strength

The Dogecoin team argues that what truly drives blockchain forward is diversity—not monopolization. “You don’t get innovation by telling every developer to build the same thing,” one contributor wrote. Dogecoin itself started as a meme, but has evolved into a low-fee, community-driven project that sees daily use for tipping, microtransactions, and even charity.

The team believes that different projects fill different needs: Ethereum powers DeFi and NFTs; Dogecoin enables fast, cheap transactions; and Bitcoin serves as a store of value. “Pretending only one of those matters is short-sighted,” they added.

The Bigger Picture: A Multi-Chain Future?

The back-and-forth between Dogecoin’s devs and Bitcoin advocates like Saylor reflects a deeper philosophical divide in crypto. One side envisions a world dominated by Bitcoin alone; the other sees a decentralized landscape full of diverse tools and use cases. As the crypto world matures, this debate will likely shape how investors, regulators, and developers prioritize the next generation of innovation.

For now, though, it looks like Dogecoin won’t be backing down anytime soon—from the jokes or the serious questions.