Binance Rejects WSJ Allegations Over Sanctions Compliance

Binance is facing fresh scrutiny after a report from The Wall Street Journal alleged the crypto exchange fired internal investigators who raised concerns about transactions linked to sanctioned Iranian entities. The report claims the probe involved more than $1 billion in transactions and was shut down shortly after a presidential pardon for Binance founder Changpeng Zhao. In response, Richard Teng, CEO of Binance, strongly denied the accusations, calling them “false and defamatory.”

Binance Rejects WSJ Allegations

Richard Teng pushed back firmly against the claims. He stated that Binance did not fire staff for flagging suspicious activity and insisted the company follows strict compliance standards. Moreover, Binance threatened legal action and demanded a retraction from the newspaper.

According to the WSJ report, former employees said internal investigators had identified transactions tied to entities linked to sanctioned jurisdictions, including Iran. The article claims Binance later dismantled the internal probe. However, Teng rejected that version of events and said the exchange remains committed to regulatory compliance.

Senate Inquiry Raises Compliance Questions

The controversy has now reached U.S. lawmakers. Reports indicate that members of the U.S. Senate have launched an inquiry into Binance’s handling of potential sanctions-related risks involving Iran and Russia. Lawmakers are seeking clarity on the exchange’s internal controls and risk management processes.

This inquiry adds to ongoing pressure on the platform, which remains one of the largest crypto exchanges globally. Regulators have increasingly focused on how major platforms monitor transactions and enforce sanctions compliance.

Binance’s Impact on Crypto Markets

The dispute highlights broader concerns about transparency and oversight in the crypto industry. Binance dominates global trading volume, so allegations about its internal controls carry weight across the market.

At the same time, supporters argue that large exchanges often face intense scrutiny because of their size and influence. Critics, however, say that strong compliance systems are essential if crypto firms want mainstream acceptance.

As the situation unfolds, the key question will be whether Binance can reassure regulators and investors. The outcome of the Senate inquiry and any potential legal battle with the WSJ could shape how authorities view crypto compliance in the years ahead.